Hi, Roger here, to relate a discussion and its aftermath that veered mightily from the topic.
A couple of years ago, my wife Karen and I invited friends Sandy and her husband Jim over to our place for dinner and drinks. Karen Sandy are best friends, having met and bonded as spouses at a corporate function while Jim and I had gotten shanghaied by our boss's boss, who wanted to go on... and on... about the corporation, how he was doing marvelous things, how we had bright futures, and so forth. Jim and I did all the appropriate nodding and attention-paying, and by the time we extricated ourselves - calling over another coworker to be fresh bait for the angling boss, then fleeing for the bar ostensibly for refills - the wives had bonded and were well on their way to a gleeful if slightly soused evening of making fun of all things corporate and most things male - easy targets, but they were having fun, no offenses taken.
That led to our getting together as a foursome maybe once a month, since we lived in the same urban sprawl but about a half hour away from each other. We were all in our early 30s, in no rush to have kids yet, but knowing that was part of both our long-term goals. Jim and I were in different departments, but our job lives crossed frequently, so we kept in touch easily.
For the record, I'm about 5'11", 180, brown/green, medium build. Jim's 2nd generation Italian and it shows in his black hair and dark eyes, a bit swarthy 5'9" or so, probably my weight or so, since he's chunkier. We're both in decent shape, neither of us Adonises, but we'll do, or so the wives kindly tell us.
Karen and Sandy are similar yet far from twins. They were each about 5'5" or so, medium builds, Caucasian as all get-out, sharing Scottish roots as I also have. Sandy is well-named, with light brown hair and hazel eyes, while Karen's a definite brunette with brown eyes that hint of an Eastern European past mixed in. Karen's got the edge up top, with a wonderful and firm 34C to what I'd guess is a 34B for Sandy, while Sandy has a nicer ass (don't tell Karen I said so & hers is fine too), with a sway to her walk that is magnetic and mesmerizing. Overall, Karen's trimmer, Sandy more voluptuous thanks to her more generous hips, despite the cup sizes.
The discussion that night ranged all over the place, with dinner dishes done, all of us casual and with that Friday evening thankfulness going, aided by wine for the ladies and bourbon for us guys. Our living room has four comfortable easy chairs arranged facing center, with side tables, so we were guy-girl alternating, with drinks at our sides, relaxed and just chilling.
Eventually we somehow go onto the latest gender issues that society is wrestling with, each of us fine with our personal cis-gendered heterosexuality, and fine with letting others pursue their own blisses. That in turn led to someone asking the difference between polygamy and polygyny, and that led onto an etymology of all sorts of sexual terms, with the quick cell phone checks filling in background on just when and how the various terms were introduced, or morphed, into English. Fortunately, as friends, the ideas flowed in good spirits, possibly aided by the adult beverages.
One of the terms we addressed was "monogamy." Interesting term, in that we all agreed that we were "monogamous," in the vernacular, and thought that was the most successful strategy for a culture to adopt. Hmm. We were prevaricating, but we were thinking we were sincere, I thought. In turn, we admitted that while our society claims to like monogamy, there are lots who don't follow society's dicta in that regard.
So, just to clear things up, "monogamy" is, according to the internet ('means true, right?) is being married to one spouse at a time, or more specifically to be having sexual relation with only one person at a time, or zoologically to have only one mate at a time, or something like that.
The discussion went from there, revisiting the "sexual relations" excuse that became (in)famous. Just where do you draw the line, and is it a wavering line, or a gray area, or just up to the two (or more) people involved to call what the rules of the game are?
Karen flatly declared that monogamy implied, and for her required, sexual fidelity within marriage, which in turn meant no sexual intercourse between a married person and anyone else but that person's married spouse. Easy to say. I wasn't about to disagree, having chosen my usually favored approach of sitting back and letting the stew simmer before jumping in.
Jim countered, "Well, ok, then. What about forms of sexual affection that fall short of intercourse but are more than just a handshake?" Thatta boy, Jim, took my next line right away.
Karen argued, "Well, there's a line somewhere. It's sort of like that Supreme Court ruling about not being able to define it but knowing what pornography is."
"I think that was 'obscenity,' but point taken," I offered.
"OK, how about cheek kissing hello?" Sandy chimed in, warming to the subject.
"That would be ok, duh. Everybody does that, right?"
"Yes, and it's sort of flirty to do that, so how about flirting?" Sandy pursued.
I looked at Sandy, and she had a smile going, enjoying the discussion and flirting herself by taking it further. She met my look and the smile widened as we held each other's gaze a bit longer than needed. I knew that we'd just flirted over that, and wondered if held gazes would qualify in Karen's violation of monogamy view.
"I think it would depend," Karen said.
I was waiting on my opportunity, saw it, and took it. I got up, leaned over Sandy's chair, and kissed her, on the lips, gently but insistently, and not quickly. I'd say I held it maybe 15 seconds, and enjoyed every bit of it, and was very, very pleased that she didn't resist at all beyond a bit of a jerk of surprise when I first made contact. I resisted mightily introducing a bit of tongue to see her reaction, but held off, just doing a kiss.
Then I stood and returned to my chair - a whole foot and a half or so, sat down, and said, "OK, now, have I trespassed beyond the bounds of monogamy?"
Karen was seething, maybe realizing that nothing sexual per se had happened, but that she had felt a distinct negative emotional reaction. How could she object without sounding prudish? Jim was pretty much at a loss, but not pleased about it. Sandy was grinning, as she got where I was going, I thought.